|
Welcome to the Poker Forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Click here to register.
Members get :
- Access to all discussion rooms
- A Chance to participate in our private member only freerolls.
- A chance to improve their poker skills and pass on their knowledge to others.
| What defines "Ace-Rag"? Theory, Advice, Strategies  | |
07-18-2005, 10:01 AM
| | | | What defines "Ace-Rag"? I read a tournament strategy explaining that when playing 9-way or 10-way tables to fold Ace-rag hands as a rule. I've been using this, folding those A2 - A6 offsuit hands, and I think saved me from wasting a good deal of chips. Beyond the obvious hands, what defines Ace-rag? A2 suited? A7 offsuit? What about A8 suited... does that become a legitamately raisable hand?
I'm talking only in terms of table with at least 8 players. Less opponents and it becomes more play-it-by-ear. I'd like to hear what you think about ALL hands consisting of an ACE, and ANY OTHER card 9 OR LOWER (including suited/offsuit). | |
07-18-2005, 05:14 PM
| | | | I consider Ace rag to be any hand of A2-A9 although I have been known to play A2-A5 suited for two reasons
first the possible wheel also the possible nut flush also maybe any ace suit in an unraised pot. | |
07-18-2005, 05:59 PM
| | | | I almost never raise with A2-T, especially if it is off-suit. Sometimes one the button or very late in the hand, with maybe one person limping in, I will raise with ATs, but probably not ATo. I have started folding AT from very early positions and folding A9 from almost all positions, except for very late with no raises. Like Reticman said, you could try to limp in with an Ace Rag suited, but don't raise with these. | |
07-21-2005, 07:40 PM
| | | | With Ace Rag unsuited, I really feel it's a catch-or-release kind of hand. And by catch, I mean catch two pair. Flopping a pair of aces usually isn't good enough. Unless the table is checked to you, there's no way of knowing if your pair of A's is outkicked. | |
07-21-2005, 09:49 PM
| | | | Any hand A10 off or lower. Or A10 and lower that is not in position to limp in with.
Making the cut off A10 instead of A9 may be too tight for some players. But, I tend to lean to being conservative when I play.
It works for me. | |
07-21-2005, 10:11 PM
| | | | I generally toss A2-A9 in early and middle positions whether suited or not. If I am in late position a call or raise is possible depending on what type of game I am in. AT is not a favorite hand either but I will push a bit with AT in late position . | |
07-22-2005, 08:37 PM
| | | | Suppose you are in first position, that is the seat directly to the left of the big blind and you are dealt Ace of clubs and 2 of diamonds (Ac,2d). Deciding to play the hand and go against Sklansky's(Those who have read Sklansky know that Ace-little unsuited does not make it into his 8 hand groupings and often times should not be played from early position. )
advice could cost you. For this example let us suppose that you call the big blind and several players behind you also call but no one raises behind you. In addition the small blind calls and the big blind checks. The flop comes 3h,6s,Ad. Now what? You are third to act after the blinds. Do you bet because you have top pair on board?
It is obvious that if another player is holding an ace you could be in big trouble. Hopefully he is holding ace deuce like you so that a split pot is possible. If another player has an ace with any card besides a 2 you are behind at this point even though you hit top pair. Intuitively one could argue that since 2 of the 4 aces are already accounted for there is a good chance that no one else has another ace. However, the math shows that there is a 62 percent chance that at least one other player was dealt an ace in our example.
In this example you hit top pair yet this may be a bad thing in that you may have the second best hand all the way to the river. It is a classic example of a scenario where as Mike Sexton says, "you don't know what you're rooting for." If you decide to fold the hand after the ace comes on board then why were you playing it in the first place? Were you hoping for an ace not to come on board? Did you think the flop would have both an ace and a deuce? Are you going to stick around to try and get a deuce on board or a 4,5 for a bicycle straight?
Hopefully the above example showed you some of the problems that can be encountered when playing ace-little offsuit from early position. Ace-little suited is another story because you have a better chance of getting the nut flush. For example, if you have Ad,2d and the flop has 2 more diamonds then you have a 35 percent chance of getting the flush by the river. If the flush in your suit is the best hand then you have the nut flush because you have the ace(unless of course there is a straight flush out there).
The Math:
How is it that we know you have a 35 percent chance of completing your flush when 2 of the flop cards are the same suit as your hole cards? The math works by showing the odds of you not getting your flush and then subtracting that percent from 1. The odds of the turn card not helping with your flush are equal to the number of cards left minus your outs divided by the number of cards left or (47-9)/47. The odds of you not getting the flush card on the river are a similiar number but there is now one less card so the odds are (46-9)/46.
This means the odds of completing the flush are:
=1-(((47-9)/47)*((46-9)/46))
=1-((38/47)*(37/46))
=1-(.808511*.804348)
=1-.650324
=.349676
=35 percent
My friend Tony Mueller helped me get the odds for at least one other player holding an ace using logic similar to the logic for computing flush completion odds. We solve the problem by first seeing the odds of no one else getting an ace and then we subtract that percent from 1.
The odds of no one else being dealt an ace are:
The first of the 18 cards times the second times the third and so on. The odds of the first card not being one of the 2 other aces are 45/47. The odds of the second card not being one of the other 2 aces are 44/46 and so on to the 18th card. Thus the chances of no one else getting one of the 2 remainin aces are:
=(45/47)*(44/46)*...*(28/30)
=.375578
Therefore the chances that at least one other player got another ace are 62 percent. It is easy to get this number in excel using the product function to multiply the 18 fractions together | |
07-22-2005, 08:50 PM
| | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by MZZUTC Suppose you are in first position, that is the seat directly to the left of the big blind and you are dealt Ace of clubs and 2 of diamonds (Ac,2d). Deciding to play the hand and go against Sklansky's(Those who have read Sklansky know that Ace-little unsuited does not make it into his 8 hand groupings and often times should not be played from early position. )
advice could cost you. For this example let us suppose that you call the big blind and several players behind you also call but no one raises behind you. In addition the small blind calls and the big blind checks. The flop comes 3h,6s,Ad. Now what? You are third to act after the blinds. Do you bet because you have top pair on board?
It is obvious that if another player is holding an ace you could be in big trouble. Hopefully he is holding ace deuce like you so that a split pot is possible. If another player has an ace with any card besides a 2 you are behind at this point even though you hit top pair. Intuitively one could argue that since 2 of the 4 aces are already accounted for there is a good chance that no one else has another ace. However, the math shows that there is a 62 percent chance that at least one other player was dealt an ace in our example.
In this example you hit top pair yet this may be a bad thing in that you may have the second best hand all the way to the river. It is a classic example of a scenario where as Mike Sexton says, "you don't know what you're rooting for." If you decide to fold the hand after the ace comes on board then why were you playing it in the first place? Were you hoping for an ace not to come on board? Did you think the flop would have both an ace and a deuce? Are you going to stick around to try and get a deuce on board or a 4,5 for a bicycle straight?
Hopefully the above example showed you some of the problems that can be encountered when playing ace-little offsuit from early position. Ace-little suited is another story because you have a better chance of getting the nut flush. For example, if you have Ad,2d and the flop has 2 more diamonds then you have a 35 percent chance of getting the flush by the river. If the flush in your suit is the best hand then you have the nut flush because you have the ace(unless of course there is a straight flush out there).
The Math:
How is it that we know you have a 35 percent chance of completing your flush when 2 of the flop cards are the same suit as your hole cards? The math works by showing the odds of you not getting your flush and then subtracting that percent from 1. The odds of the turn card not helping with your flush are equal to the number of cards left minus your outs divided by the number of cards left or (47-9)/47. The odds of you not getting the flush card on the river are a similiar number but there is now one less card so the odds are (46-9)/46.
This means the odds of completing the flush are:
=1-(((47-9)/47)*((46-9)/46))
=1-((38/47)*(37/46))
=1-(.808511*.804348)
=1-.650324
=.349676
=35 percent
My friend Tony Mueller helped me get the odds for at least one other player holding an ace using logic similar to the logic for computing flush completion odds. We solve the problem by first seeing the odds of no one else getting an ace and then we subtract that percent from 1.
The odds of no one else being dealt an ace are:
The first of the 18 cards times the second times the third and so on. The odds of the first card not being one of the 2 other aces are 45/47. The odds of the second card not being one of the other 2 aces are 44/46 and so on to the 18th card. Thus the chances of no one else getting one of the 2 remainin aces are:
=(45/47)*(44/46)*...*(28/30)
=.375578
Therefore the chances that at least one other player got another ace are 62 percent. It is easy to get this number in excel using the product function to multiply the 18 fractions together | MZZUTC,
Credit should be given, where credit is due. This came from "FlopTurnRiver.com" http://www.flopturnriver.com/essays_...ll_kicker.html
PKRBABY  | |
07-22-2005, 08:56 PM
| | | | My bad, Im going to be posting a lot of crap from that site, I think it could help out a lot of us! | |
07-22-2005, 09:10 PM
| | | | Ace rag is A2 to A9 off suit, however in the right position it can be played, such as on the button with noone in the hand. But Ace rag gets alot of players in trouble, especially the inexperienced ones. | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 PM. |
Latest THF threads :
| |  |