Would you call this all in???

I think here is a strong case for folding. There are so many strong hands that beat you AQ, AJ, K10 AA QQ JJ - all quite probable with the betting so far. The fact he is going all in tells you 1) this is an outragous bluff for very few chips 2) he has something strong and Ax doesnt do it. Why did he go all in though. Noone bluffs for that few chips and if they do you will get a better chance at them later. Going all in he may do to set up bluffs for future, to disguise the way he plays AA or in the hopes next time he bets big with a strong hand someone will call. Who knows but why risk all your chips with something to far from the nuts.

Also it is not as if - even if you have the best of it - that he will lose as he will have some outs as he will have at least an A, K or 10 most of the time. Folding here also sets up some sslow plays for the future. So fold should be the correct play. If it wasnt a turbo then it is a clear fold. With a turbo you are less guarenteed to get enough hands to exploit reads/table image but you should still get a better/ safer oppertunity to double through than this. If it was A87 and you held 87 then folding to me would be alot harder and I am not sure what I would do but in the scenario you describe I am surprised so many agreed with your course of action.