Texas Holdem Forums  
  Main Options
Home
Games Schedule
Member Blogs
Arcade
Poker Articles
Poker Odds Guide
Hand History Converter
THF Bonus Guide
Playing Online
Interviews
THF Tournaments
Member Reviews
THF Product Reviews
Gallery
Poker Links
THF Chat

  Bonus offers
Pacific Poker
25% Bonus Match up to $100
Party Poker
30% Bonus Match up to $150
CDPoker
100% Bonus Match up to $500 using bonus code THF500

  USA Friendly Site
Sportsbook.com Poker
100% Bonus Match up to $1000
  
Quick Links
Please enter your Username:  Password:  to

Welcome to the Poker Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Click here to register.

Members get :
  • Access to all discussion rooms
  • A Chance to participate in our private member only freerolls.
  • A chance to improve their poker skills and pass on their knowledge to others.
Register today to benefit from all site privileges

Go Back   Poker Forums > Texas Hold Em Rooms > Other Poker Games, Professional Players, TV, Movies & More > Professional Players, TV, Movies & More

WSOP 05' Will Any Big Names Win This Time?

Professional Players, TV, Movies & More

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2005, 07:55 AM
Post Number: 1 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
High Card
Milkman045 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 15
Shouts:
Credits: 10
Default WSOP 05' Will Any Big Names Win This Time?

With more and more people getting into poker and with more and more people just paying the $10,000 because they got the money. Will we ever see the big names take over anymore? I mean with more and more people playing and some of the them getting lucky, I'm not sure if any big name players will win it this year. Sure you got to be pretty good to take home the money...but it's not that hard to get some lucky hands and bring it home...
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 03:54 PM
Post Number: 2 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
Three of a Kind
biggsblind01 is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 109
Shouts:
Credits: 135.5
Default

eh....I'm gonna have to disagree with you here man. Firstly, I don't know if a pro will win, but there are a lot more amatuers than pros that play in it. Also, I wouldn't same it's easy to get a "few" lucky hands and "bring it home." You might get past the first day with that, but not win it. That takes honest skill; skill that the pros have. Also, all these pros basically have a bounty on their head. Everyone wants to play against the pros b/c it's a thrill, and then even if they lose they can say, "I knocked Gus Hanson, or Doyle Brunson, etc." These guys are being gunned at. But what Dan Negreuneu (I have no idea how to spell that). He won the tourney leader board award over all the tourneys. That's a pretty obvious distinction that the pros have an up on the rest of the field. That's why they're the pros. ~ Biggs
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 04:00 PM
Post Number: 3 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
@ C e's Avatar
Two Pair
@ C e is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 51
Shouts:
Credits: 10
Default

the thing is amature will risk it all on a draw that how alot of pro get knocked out these day by the amature going in on a draw and hitting it
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 04:15 PM
Post Number: 4 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
theprofessor's Avatar
Jedi Slayer
theprofessor is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,789
Shouts:
Credits: 2206.805
Default

I agree that the sheer number of amatuers makes it harder for the pros. But if you look at the number of amatuers compared to the number of pros at the beginning of a tournament and then again at the end (say the final table) the ratio is far less. This shows that the pros still know how to stick around. I think they still have a shot at this thing. Dan Harrington made the final table 2 years in a row. Thats skill...not luck.
__________________
"I started with nothing. I still have most of it left."

"I find your lack of faith disturbing"

http://live.xbox.com/member/JediSlayer76

theprofessor@texasholdemforums.com
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 06:33 PM
Post Number: 5 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
CRAPSHOOT's Avatar
Royal Flush
CRAPSHOOT is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,089
Shouts:
Credits: 36694.69
Default

I agree with ya proffessa...but I also feel that the world series is getting a little more like internet poker and the sheer number of uncalled for risk takers makes it tough. When you have a lot of players willing to risk it all for a miracle draw...most will lose, but some will get lucky and those that get lucky might not win the tournament, but they may have, just knocked out a pro.

If you notice a good player does not have luck...luck is not needed, because they are playing good solid hands and solid play...luck is needed when you need to turn a average hand into the nuts. Bad luck, is what a good player can't have...that is when an opponent turns their junk hand into a "bad beat".

We only see the final tabels at the series, unless your at the game, we don't see all the crap that goes on in the early days.

Winning at hold'em tournaments is becoming more like "winning the Lotto"

Last edited by CRAPSHOOT; 02-24-2005 at 04:10 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 08:15 PM
Post Number: 6 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
Three of a Kind
biggsblind01 is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 109
Shouts:
Credits: 135.5
Default

I think what allows the pros to get to far into the tourney, is merely their opponents not getting lucky. They're going to get in far better positions and out play the amatuers. Then they just need their better hands to hold up. If their opponents don't get lucky, then they'll do well. It's all about dodging bulletts. ~ Biggs
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 08:59 PM
Post Number: 7 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
olysports's Avatar
Online Shark
olysports is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: naperville, IL
Posts: 268
Shouts:
Credits: 1844.355
Default

I think that amatuers will eventually try, if not already try, to take over professional poker. More and more amatuers are going to play in the WSOP every year and some of them may become the next Phil Ivey or Howard Ledderer. Not as many pros will make to the final table every year. Eventually, it might be that a pro may not win in the next ten years or so.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 09:17 PM
Post Number: 8 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
Pair
BrPanthers99 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 48
Shouts:
Credits: 10
Default

Marcel Luscke (spelled wrong) made it in 10th last year, Harrington was 4th I believe. Pros do make it to the final table, even in big events. The year before, Harrington made it too. I think there will always be a few pros, but you will never have a final table with like 5-6 pros.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 09:30 PM
Post Number: 9 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
Three of a Kind
hess is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 153
Shouts:
Credits: 85.5
Default

I feel that a pro has a chance at winning the big event if he is in the right chip position going into the final table. Dan Harrington or Marcel Luske each would have had a great chance at winning if they had more chips entering the final table.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 10:35 PM
Post Number: 10 (Link This Post)   
Report this post!
CRAPSHOOT's Avatar
Royal Flush
CRAPSHOOT is offline
Approved
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,089
Shouts:
Credits: 36694.69
Default

Better than that hess, they would have a better chance of winning if they had the most chips at the end of the tournament.

It gets down to sheer numbers. A good player can get in the money on the sit n go's a majority of the time...but put that same player in a 3,000 entry tournament and they are not even guarenteed to make it to the first break. The amaturers are increasing vastly every year in the world series.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 AM. | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

  Latest THF threads : Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to My AOL

 
 
   A Texas Holdem Forums Development | Unique Skin owned by Texas Holdem Forums and optimised for a 1024x768 resolution and above
   Site design and content Copyright© of Texas Holdem Forums | It may not be reproduced without our consent
   Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.1. Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.