Elvis,
You are saying that after one game you are done with the site? I know I loved pokerstars interface and didn't want to switch but sites grow on you. I am now used to shootout and poker.com. Stars feels weird to me now. I havent played there in forever.
Secondly, I dont know what kind of a bankroll you have, but you are trying to withdraw $22. If I make a $50 deposit at a site, I play either until I build it up or lose it all and then decide whether to play there again. You should not have to depend on that $22. Any site you goto you can EXPECT a hassle withdrawing. I can't have netteller because of my location, and it is HELL. I have not found and easy way to withdraw yet at any site.
Thirdly, it seems very funky to me that you write a review after one outting at a poker site. You are entitled to your opinion but I would hope you give the site a little more of a chance than that. Poker.com is my #1 site to play at right now, and to see a review like this makes me wonder if you know what poker.com is all about...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elvis Henry The first thing that I immediately disliked was that all sit and gos are turbos -- seven minute blinds. Period. |
I believe there are more interavels to balance this out. Each sit N go usually takes about an hour to complete so this is not considered a "Turbo"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elvis Henry The interface is slllooooowwww. The players are slllooooooowwwwwwwer. It has to be the klunkiest software I have ever used for online poker. |
Shoot has had problems with speed on this site but I havent. I think a lot depends on your computer, but they are working on making this more friendly to slower setups.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elvis Henry It took nearly 10 minutes before enough players made themselves available to get a game on. |
You are too used to poker stars.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elvis Henry The rabbit feature is cool. |
The smileys and one card show are also cool features.