Game 6 had a similar hand as game 2 but this time it worked like it is suppose to.
All-in pre-flop with PP having the larger stack...now let's hear from the criticizers on this one.
*********** # 28 **************
PokerStars Game #17739861003: Tournament #89775707, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2008/05/27 - 21:38:32 (ET) Table '89775707 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: FinK22 (710 in chips)
Seat 2: xCRAPSHOOTx (2290 in chips)
xCRAPSHOOTx: posts small blind 10
FinK22: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to xCRAPSHOOTx [7d 7c]
xCRAPSHOOTx: raises 40 to 60
FinK22: raises 100 to 160
xCRAPSHOOTx: raises 2130 to 2290 and is all-in
FinK22: calls 550 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (1580) returned to xCRAPSHOOTx
*** FLOP *** [4d Ad 6d]
*** TURN *** [4d Ad 6d] [8d]
*** RIVER *** [4d Ad 6d 8d] [Qs]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
FinK22: shows [9c Qh] (a pair of Queens)
xCRAPSHOOTx: shows [7d 7c] (a flush, Ace high)
xCRAPSHOOTx collected 1420 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1420 | Rake 0
Board [4d Ad 6d 8d Qs]
Seat 1: FinK22 (big blind) showed [9c Qh] and lost with a pair of Queens Seat 2: xCRAPSHOOTx (button) (small blind) showed [7d 7c] and won (1420) with a flush, Ace high
Yes he could have had an Ace and beat me...he could have also beat me with the Queen if I didn't flush...but that is besides the point...in most cases the PP is going to win, or make the opponent fold. |