|
Welcome to the Poker Forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Click here to register.
Members get :
- Access to all discussion rooms
- A Chance to participate in our private member only freerolls.
- A chance to improve their poker skills and pass on their knowledge to others.
| when to call with a pair Playing Online  | |
04-09-2008, 04:33 AM
| | | | Gettheshades and Racingdog,
Thank you for the very good comments.
Are there a lot of pros who only raise? I feel like that is best for me. There are tons of callers in the games I play. The only position I feel like calling in is in the small blind with a low or medium pair or a suited connector, preferrably higher cards. Otherwise, I think I'm going to only raise, and not play any hands weaker than KJ. I've had many hours with these weak players and this is what I've refined to.
I'm absolutely sure that agains better players I would play differently, and I would start bluffing once in a while.
I'm open to criticism. If some pros only raise, that sounds great to me. What do these pros that only raise do on the button or in the small blind?
Trapping seems important at the micro level, you are absolutely correct.
Again, I'm open to criticism. | |
04-09-2008, 11:57 PM
| | | | Well, I think saying always raise is too simplistic in general. Let's ignore first to bet situations, we've more or less covered that. So at the risk of repeating myself....
What if there are already limpers? Suppose you have a strong hand, but not a premier hand. What have these limpers got? They haven't all got 87s. Some of them may have your cards. Some of them could be slow playing a seriously strong hand. If you are at micro limits and you raise you are unlikely to thin the field much and worse, you have no idea where you stand. You might as well have no idea where you stand at a smaller cost and just join in the limping. At higher limits you raise. This will not only thin the field, and maybe pick up the chips immediately, but you will have a much better idea where you stand. You may be unsure about the guys behind you, but you can start to put the guys in front of you on some sort of slow play. The situation is just so much healthier because it is clearer.
What if there has already been a raise? Well this is much the same at any limit. Call with a hand you would have raised with, reraise with a premium hand. Having said that, at micro limits, depending on your stack size, you can easily fold a hand that is at the bottom end of the range of raising hands because bieng wrong is too expensive.
But, if you are playing at a smaller site, some of the small buy in tourneys are much tighter than at larger sites. You need to just take stock during level one and figure out what is going on. Err on the side of caution if you get a playable hand. Then play the individuals as appropriate thereafter. | |
04-10-2008, 07:56 PM
| | | | I guess my question would be, then, why does playing tight help so much with loose players.
If I can break down why it works, maybe I can be more flexible.
Also, as you hinted, reads are at least half of NLTH.
The strategy is just a framework. Like I played a $3 buyin a couple of days ago, and I was playing my usual strategy I told you of, and someone kept going all in and I saw his cards and they were crap. The next time he went all in, I had KQo which I would normally not call an all in with, but I knew that was the right play and it worked. I think he had like J9o or something similar.
So saying always is unrealistic, like you said.
So again, why is playing tight so helpful at loose tables? I have some ideas, but it's been mostly trial and error. | |
04-10-2008, 08:30 PM
| | | | At loose tables, pots are much bigger than tight tables. Now, if you happen to hit a monster on a loose table, you should get payed off nicely - but if you are loose at a loose table, you are losing blinds with each loose preflop call you make. By the time you are dealt a monster, you might be able to get a little above break-even, but realistically you won't be making much.
Meanwhile, if you are playing tight, only premium cards, there is a much higher probability that the hands you play will win at showdown. And so, while you will win the same monster pots as if you were loose, you aren't throwing away blinds - so you can win quite a bit.
I know you didn't ask about tight tables, but it's related so I'll go into it. At tight tables, its generally good to play loose-aggressive. This is because any time you raise, if you don't pick up the blinds you at least isolate an opponent, and you will have a good idea of what your opponent could hold - thus making post-flop play much simpler. The blinds you lose when you're reraised preflop are easily made up for by all the times you successfully pick up the blinds.
__________________ 1st place, March/April 2008 Sunday League Fault always lies in the same place, my fine babies: with him weak enough to lay blame. | |
04-15-2008, 07:12 PM
| | | | Quote:
If you're just talking about pot odds, then 6.5 to 1 odds would give you the correct odds to call with your pair.
i.e you're around 13% to hit a set on the flop...about 6.5 to 1.
With the blinds and 5 callers, you'd be getting almost exactly the right odds to call and see a flop.
| Except with that many people in the hand, wouldn't you be really, really watching for straights and flushes? Wouldn't it be better with implied odds to do this against 4 or less opponents?
So I'm guessing that limping on the button with any pair (with multiple callers) is all around a good play according to you guys because of implied odds.
I'm worried about losing a packet because of a straight, flush, or full house. What do you guys do if one of these looks like it's possible? When do I start checking instead of betting 1/2 the pot?
Thanks. | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 PM. |
Latest THF threads :
| |  |