Why?

I still never understand why this happens...as you can see this was in a tournament nonetheless....who even plays K6 in the first half of the tournament and this is on what? level 2? I figured when that K came out it was his...but he was calling bets with a 6 KICKER? Just astonishes me...

PokerStars Game #1701620427: Tournament #7715299, Hold'em Limit - Level I (20/40) - 2005/05/15 - 09:12:56 (ET)
Table '7715299 57' Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: hypocrit (1090 in chips)
Seat 2: MasoY (1780 in chips)
Seat 3: LabsLover (1480 in chips)
Seat 4: rutledge (1580 in chips)
Seat 5: Castaflac2 (1760 in chips)
Seat 6: BrozaC (1650 in chips)
Seat 7: nicehanddan (1440 in chips)
Seat 8: Neutrality (1520 in chips)
Seat 9: Showtime069 (1200 in chips)
Neutrality: posts small blind 10
Showtime069: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Neutrality [Qd As]
hypocrit: calls 20
MasoY: folds
LabsLover: folds
rutledge: calls 20
Castaflac2: calls 20
BrozaC: folds
nicehanddan: folds
Neutrality: raises 20 to 40
Showtime069: folds
hypocrit: calls 20
rutledge: calls 20
Castaflac2: calls 20
*** FLOP *** [8s Tc Ts]
Neutrality: bets 20
hypocrit: folds
rutledge: calls 20
Castaflac2: calls 20
*** TURN *** [8s Tc Ts] [Qc]
Neutrality: bets 40
rutledge: calls 40
Castaflac2: calls 40
*** RIVER *** [8s Tc Ts Qc] [Ks]
Neutrality: bets 40
rutledge: folds
Castaflac2: calls 40
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Neutrality: shows [Qd As] (two pair, Queens and Tens)
Castaflac2: shows [6s Kh] (two pair, Kings and Tens)
Castaflac2 collected 440 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 440 | Rake 0
Board [8s Tc Ts Qc Ks]
Seat 1: hypocrit folded on the Flop
Seat 2: MasoY folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: LabsLover folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: rutledge folded on the River
Seat 5: Castaflac2 showed [6s Kh] and won (440) with two pair, Kings and Tens
Seat 6: BrozaC folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: nicehanddan (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Neutrality (small blind) showed [Qd As] and lost with two pair, Queens and Tens
Seat 9: Showtime069 (big blind) folded before Flop

I am no great shakes at limit tourneys but do make a profit and 2-3table sng limit tourneys and here are my thoughts

1) in NL players will sometimes play rubbish start cards am because of the big profits they remember sometimes making they continue to do so. If a board doesnt have an A on if players will sometimes call bets to see if a K appears thinking they will get good implied odds if it does. This is particularly common when they dont think anyone has got anything better than top boarded pair at best. These players sometimes play limit and make very little strategy adjustments even although they will be getting nothing near implied odds for this play.

2) some players who are quite good at limit tourneys play in apparently reckless ways early to advertise for when the blinds are much higher

3) many players are just rubbish and either dont realise this or just dont care. I have found even playing in a 30$MTT there were a lot of opponents who didnt really seem to know what they were doing - some thought it was NL and only realised their mistake too late others were just rubbish players. As MTT's of limit take ages many good players at limit will make their profits at ring games where they can exploit their reads of 1 player beyond what they could in a tourney and bad beats will not stop them from making a decent and predictable profit rate per hour. 3-4 hours into a MTT a string of bad beats could leave you out of the money or just in the money getting virtually nothing for your time. Bad players can play for 2-3 hours and have a slim chance of winning big money which they couldnt do at .5/1 tables but they can only lose their buy in not all of their bankroll. This means that you get a lot of rubbish players at 5-30$ limit tourneys and not all that many serious poker players. Thats my view anyway.